I realized that, if I had this problem with the opening books about the Grünfeld, I’d probably have it with other openings I am interested in. But the whole episode made me realize that the navigation through the chess opening literature can often be difficult and confusing, due to the reasons mentioned above (differentiating good from bad books and finding a book on a specific line you are interested in).
We did manage to detect a worthy resource. I had to seek help from more experienced (and stronger) players. It was very difficult to find a good resource and to start studying it. However, as I started searching, I realized finding a good Grünfeld book for is not so straightforward, to begin with (especially from White perspective), let alone finding a good Grünfeld book on a specific line (which was not even one of the main-lines in this particular instance).Īs someone who has never played the Grünfeld with either colour, I have never followed which books about this opening have been released throughout the years. I remember saying something condescending 3 and patronizingly explaining to him there are these beautiful tools called Chessbase and chess books and embarked on a quick Google search to find a good book about the variation at hand. „Vjeko, how exactly do I „work“ on my chess? How do I even begin studying an opening or a certain line?“
We started talking about a certain line of the Grünfeld defence (for White) he was interested in 2 and he half-jokingly asked me: He is one of those guys who have an innate talent for the game, yet who never got down to study chess seriously (or who at least claim so), but who recently got the motivation to improve his game.
0 kommentar(er)
